Lead singers who don’t play an instrument

You’re worthless and I’m sick of your dancing.

I mean, seriously, these idiots can’t play an instrument, so they are stuck singing. Which, in itself, is fairly boring to watch, so they feel the need to gyrate around the stage, convulsing and stomping their feet. Lame.

Honestly, the only thing more worthless than a lead singer who doesn’t play an instrument is a no-armed monkey who can play the cymbals.

I flipped passed some random pop-crap band on New Year’s Eve playing on some stage. This chick lead singer was just pulsating around on the stage. How frickin awkward. I had a hard time watching it for the .8 seconds before I turned the channel, but what if you were there in person? What are you supposed to do in that situation?

I think point and laugh is probably the best answer.

Bookmark and Share
More Reviews
« Church Handshakes and the 3-Shake method
Sunshine »

This entry was posted on Sunday, January 11th, 2009 at 7:58 am and is filed under Music, People. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

4 Responses to “Lead singers who don’t play an instrument”

  1. jack23 Says:
    January 12th, 2009 at 3:17 am

    what about chris cornell? soundgarden and audioslave is awesome

  2. eckert Says:
    January 12th, 2009 at 6:15 am

    but think about how much more awesome they could be if he did less dancing and more musicing.

  3. Jason Says:
    January 18th, 2009 at 12:07 pm

    Sorry dude… you’re dumb here. Vocals ARE an instrument. I agree that I prefer bands where the lead vocalist plays a guitar or piano or whatev, but I have no problem with someone who only sings either. Yes, there are certain vocalists who go to far with their prancing… so let’s discuss them individually rather than callling them all out.

  4. jack23 Says:
    June 1st, 2009 at 8:10 pm

    axl rose.

Leave a Reply